Skip to main content

Dr. Charles D. Canham

Forest Ecologist | PhD, Cornell University

Expertise
forest ecology and management

845 266-3471

Charles Canham studies the dynamics of forest ecosystems and how they respond to a wide range of human impacts. Using field research, novel statistical methods, and computer models, Canham predicts forest response to factors including climate change, introduced pests and pathogens, logging regimes, and air pollution.  

Northeastern forests have been a critical source of carbon sequestration to combat climate change, and can also potentially provide a renewable energy source. Canham and his collaborators have developed methods to assess the tradeoffs between managing forests for carbon sequestration versus biomass energy production to ensure that forest biomass energy is truly carbon neutral.

All of Canham’s work builds on a neighborhood theory of forest dynamics he has developed through research in forests around the world. The theory, and the computer model that encapsulates it (SORTIE-ND), are particularly valuable in his work to explore the development of new forestry that can simultaneously maximize the ecological benefits of species diversity and carbon sequestration and the production of high-value forest products.

In 2020 he published a book, Forests Adrift: Currents Shaping the Future of Northeastern Trees (Yale University Press), which focuses on the future of northeastern forests. His next book will focus on the role of forests in a carbon-neutral, sustainable world.

Greene, D. F., Charles D. Canham, K.D. Coates, and P. T. Lepage. 2004. “An Evaluation of Alternative Dispersal Functions for Trees”. J. Ecol. 92: 758-66. http://www.caryinstitute.org/reprints/Greene_et_al_2004_J_Ecol_92_758-766.pdf.
Schnurr, Jaclyn L., Charles D. Canham, Richard S. Ostfeld, and R.S. Inouye. 2004. “Neighborhood Analyses of Small Mammal Dynamics: Impacts on Seed Predation and Seedling Establishment”. Ecology 85: 741-55. http://www.caryinstitute.org/reprints/Schnurr_et_al_2004_Ecology_85_741-755.pdf.
Canham, Charles D., P. T. Lepage, and K.D. Coates. 2004. “A Neighborhood Analysis of Canopy Tree Competition: Effects of Shading Versus Crowding”. Can. J. For. Res. 34: 778-87. http://www.caryinstitute.org/reprints/Canham_et_al_2004_Can_J_For_Res_34_778-787.pdf.
Uriarte, Maria, Charles D. Canham, J. Thompson, and J.K. Zimmerman. 2004. “A Neighborhood Analysis of Tree Growth and Survival in a Hurricane-Driven Tropical Forest”. Ecol. Monogr. 74: 591-614. http://www.caryinstitute.org/reprints/Uriarte_et_al_2004_Ecol_Monogr-PR_neighborhood_competition.pdf.
Uriarte, Maria, R. Condit, Charles D. Canham, and S.P. Hubbell. 2004. “A Spatially-Explicit Model of Sapling Growth in a Tropical Forest: Does the Identity of Neighbours Matter?”. J. Ecol. 92: 348-60. http://www.caryinstitute.org/reprints/Uriarte_et_al_2004_J_Ecol_92_348-360.pdf.
Canham, Charles D., Michael L. Pace, M.J. Papaik, A.G.B. Primack, K.M. Roy, R.J. Maranger, R.P. Curran, and D.M. Spada. 2004. “A Spatially-Explicit Watershed-Scale Analysis of Dissolved Organic Carbon in Adirondack Lakes”. Ecol. Appl. 14: 839-54. http://www.caryinstitute.org/reprints/Canham_et_al_2004_Ecol_Appl_14_839-854.pdf.
Canham, Charles D. 2004. “Neatness Is Not a Virtue”. In J. C. Purinton (ed.). Voices of the Land, 20-24. Chelsea Green Publishing, White River Junction, Vermont.
Gratzer, G., Charles D. Canham, U. Dieckmann, A. Fischer, Y. Iwasa, R. Law, M.J. Lexer, et al. 2004. “Spatio-Temporal Development of Forests – Current Trends in Field Studies and Models”. Oikos 107: 3-15. http://www.caryinstitute.org/reprints/Gratzer_et_al_2004_Oikos_107_3-15.pdf.
Canham, Charles D., Jonathan J. Cole, and W.K. Lauenroth. 2003. “The Role of Modeling in Ecosystem Science”. In Canham, C. D., J. S. Cole, and W. K. Lauenroth (eds.), 1-12. Models in Ecosystem Science. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey. http://www.caryinstitute.org/reprints/ch_1_Canham_CC_IX_book.pdf.
Latty, E.F., Charles D. Canham, and P.L. Marks. 2003. “Beech Bark Disease in Northern Hardwood Forests: The Importance of Nitrogen Dynamics and Forest History for Disease Incidence”. Can. J. For. Res. 33: 257-68. http://www.caryinstitute.org/reprints/Latty_et_al_2003_Can_J_For_Res_22_257-268.pdf.